The big lie of the homosexual agenda is this: They claim that they are only fighting for equality and tolerance.
The big lie of the homosexual agenda is this: They claim that they are only fighting for equality and tolerance.

Theodore Shoebat / 24 DEC 2014 – Say that “Bestiality Is Wrong” or “Polygamy Is Wrong” and it’s not considered hate speech, but if you have the opinion that “Gay Marriage Is Wrong” the whole world jumps up and down screaming “racism” “bigotry” and “hatred”.

This is becoming the politically-correct norm, but no matter what one argues, this is suppressing free speech.

No one targeted pro-gay bakeries, but gay activists target Christian bakeries. “Support Gay Marriage” is one Christian bakery was sued for refusing to put that slogan on a cake for an event to support the gay agenda. Yet Christian bakeries that refuse to make pro-homosexual marriage cakes are getting sued left, right, and center. They get fined, they get death threats, and they lose their businesses. This experiment proves beyond doubt that the gay agenda is not just about their freedom to practice a sexual orientation, but the suppression of free speech.

To make our case we provided 3 video clips, the third one is a video showing homosexual activists in Ireland used the state to force a Christian bakery to make a cake with the slogan “Support Gay Marriage” for a pro-gay marriage event, but he refused which added a tremendous loss to his business. Several Christian bakeries were sued in the United States with several who lost their businesses and we said enough is enough.

So decided to call some 13 prominent pro-gay bakers in a row. Each one denied us the right to have “Gay Marriage Is Wrong” on a cake and even used deviant insults and obscenities against us. One baker even said all sorts of profanities against Christians and ended the conversation by saying that she will make me a cookie with a large phallus on it.

It was all recorded. It will stun the American people as to how militant and intolerant the homosexual bakers were. Even after we completed our experiment we got a ton of hate messages saying that we were “hateful” for simply giving them a taste of their own medicine. They argued that the slogan “Gay Marriage Is Wrong” is not the same thing as “Support Gay Marriage” as if an opposite view of a view is hateful. This would mean that the majority of Americans who oppose gay marriage are “bigoted” and “hate filled”. “Support Polygamy” or “Polygamy is Wrong” are views, yet the first which the Muslim supports and the second most Americans would never support, but both are opinions and are considered free speech.

The homosexual activist in this third video said you can’t choose who you serve, as though he is taking a purely objective position, but when we ask for the reverse of the same message, all of a sudden the saying of “you can’t choose who you serve,” does not apply to us, the Christians.


Here is our point. A Christian making a homosexual cake with “Support Gay Marriage” goes against his faith and a homosexual putting “Gay Marriage Is Wrong” goes against his faith as well. Now of course we honor their right to say no, this is not the issue, but what about honoring the Christian right to also say no?


The big lie of the homosexual agenda is this: They claim that they are only fighting for equality and tolerance.

This is false.

What then is their agenda?


Many say we are the ones who are “bigoted” “phobic” “hate mongers” … the typical remarks are:

“Support Gay Marriage” doesn’t hurt anyone, it doesn’t shame anyone. However to say “Gay marriage is wrong” or any other homophobic remarks, you’re offending and hurting people.”

One could argue such a statement by applying a different set of moral standard:

“Support Polygamous Marriage” doesn’t hurt anyone, it doesn’t shame anyone. However to say “Polygamous marriage is wrong” or any other Polygomo-phobic remarks, you’re offending and hurting Muslims and Mormons who believe in Polygamy. In fact, the later is not just an issue of sexual preference but a religious belief.

What should be good for the homosexual should also be good for the polygamist.

So where does it end?


One gay claiming to be a professor at a Catholic university even commented on our blog with the following:

“Are you aware that we gays have larger brains, superior cognitive functions, spatial memory and verbal skills? It’s a biological fact of life.”

But such views are the views of tyrannies. The Nazis and others believe in such nonsense. Tyrannies use false pseudo science and they all have a superiority complex. It is the case with every deviant cult and tyrannical movement. Why target Christian bakeries in the first place? Such a view is no different that what Christoph Meiners promoted:

“the anatomy of the Negro” and “came to the conclusion that the Negro have bigger teeth and jaws than any other race, as Negroes are all carnivores. Meiners claimed the skull of the Negro was larger but the brain of the Negro was smaller than any other race. Meiners claimed the Negro was the most unhealthy race on Earth because of the its poor diet and mode of living and lack of morals.”

The gay agenda argues that straight folks have a smaller brain.

So to all these who call us “bigoted” “homophobic” and such, in reality they are applying what is to be applied to them.

Our answer to all of detractors is this:

men and women bled for your right to be free to call us “bigoted” “phobic” “hate mongers”, but the same men and women who bled and died for your right to call us “bigoted” “phobic” “hate mongers” also died for our right to be free and not to care.


Yet we always get accused here at of lacking love since Christ, according to many, teaches that we should love the homosexual, that promoting the idea “gay marriage is wrong” makes us “homophobes”.

And we ask: does God love the homosexual, yet he hates only the homophobe? Or is it that a view which rejects an agenda is always labeled with ‘hate’ and ‘phobia’ and is why we have labels like Islamophobia and Homophobia … the world of anti-labels are the ones who truly invent labels that are intended to coerce individuals to conform to a certain mindset. In reality, the “hate” accusers are guilty of the very thing they accuse us of and are actually liars. And since “hate” is always used in such arguments claiming that God taught us that we should never hate, God has an answer: He hates:

here are six things the Lord hates,
seven that are detestable to him:
haughty eyes,
a lying tongue,
hands that shed innocent blood,
a heart that devises wicked schemes,
feet that are quick to rush into evil,
a false witness who pours out lies
and a person who stirs up conflict in the community. (Proverbs 6:16-19)

When it comes to such agendas it is not an issue of freedom, tolerance, love, hate or equality. It is always a war on which side wins. Period.

This is the case with all agendas be it Christian, Gay, Nazi, Communist, Islam …no one can stop what’s coming from the pipeline of evil.

But rejoice, the Nazi came to destroy the Church and so did the Communist, yet these tyrannies have come and gone and in the end the Church was standing victorious. We are on the winning side because God ordained the norm and set up logical standards for living.

And if the Lord says, “fear not,” why is everyone so afraid to confront this arising tyranny?

The Christian life is to fight and never give in until we win and win we will, just ask the Nazi and the Communist and the Greeks and the Romans … their empires always end while Christ reigns victorious.

But for now, knows this: every anti-Christian agenda starts by inserting the leaven and in time, it will destroy the whole batch. It starts with “don’t ask don’t tell” and it ends up with rights in the military to be open with perversions, then rights to force bakeries to give up what you believe in, and little by little you have tyranny.

Tyrannies start by a little leaven.

This is what Jesus taught.

I don’t know why the Church is afraid of confronting the homosexual agenda unless of course the church itself has been infiltrated with the leaven. Remove first the leaven in yourselves.

And isn’t “loving gays” also telling them of the dangers also?

Consequences of Homosexual Sex

Death and disease accompany promiscuous and unsanitary sexual activity. 70% to 78% of gays reported having had a sexually transmitted disease. The proportion with intestinal parasites (worms, flukes, amoeba) ranged from 25% to 59%. As of 1992, 83% of U.S. AIDS in whites had occurred in gays. The Seattle sexual diary study reported that gays had, on a yearly average:

  1. fellated 108 men and swallowed semen from 48
  2. exchanged saliva with 96
  3. experienced 68 penile penetrations of the anus
  4. ingested fecal material from 19

No wonder 10% came down with hepatitis B and 7% contracted hepatitis A during the 6-month study.

Obituaries numbering 6,516 from 16 U.S. homosexual journals over the past 12 years were compared to a large sample of obituaries from regular newspapers. The obituaries from the regular newspapers were similar to U.S. averages for longevity; the medium age of death of married men was 75, and 80% of them died old (age 65 or older). For unmarried or divorced men the median age of death was 57, and 32% of them died old. Married women averaged age 79 at death; 85% died old. Unmarried and divorced women averaged age 71, and 60% of them died old.

The median age of death for homosexuals, however, was virtually the same nationwide–and, overall, less than 2% survived to old age. If AIDS was the cause of death, the median age was 39. For the 829 gays who died of something other than AIDS, the median age of death was 42, and 9% died old. The 163 lesbians had a median age of death of 44, and 20% died old.

Two and eight-tenths percent (2.8%) of gays died violently. They were 116 times more apt to be murdered; 24 times more apt to commit suicide; and had a traffic-accident death-rate 18 times the rate of comparably-aged white males. Heart attacks, cancer and liver failure were exceptionally common. Twenty percent of lesbians died of murder, suicide, or accident–a rate 487 times higher than that of white females aged 25-44. The age distribution of samples of homosexuals in the scientific literature from 1989 to 1992 suggests a similarly shortened life-span.

P.S: There were a few folks upset saying that we were not fair since we had no right to impose our anti-homosexual views to be posted on a cake made by pro homosexuals. So we honored their rule and for the first time in our history we deleted their views from our comment section since they had no right to post their anti-Shoebat views on our cake.

They want the cake and eat it too. Get your own cake.